Monday, October 17, 2011

Canada qualifies 2 marathoners for London Olympics

Reid Coolsaet took a risk in the Scotiabank Toronto Waterfront Marathon on Sunday, walked away with a berth in next summer’s London Olympics, and nearly a Canadian record.

The 32-year-old from Hamilton narrowly missed Jerome Drayton’s 36-year-old mark, crossing the line in an unofficial two hours 10 minutes and 55 seconds for a third-place finish. Drayton ran 2:10:09 in Fukoka, Japan, in 1975.

“I decided to roll the dice and [run] with the leaders,” Coolsaet told CBC’s Scott Russell after the race. “I wanted in the middle but because of the wind I had to pick [a race position].

“It was a lot faster than I had planned going out. I thought I’d take a risk today and it kind of blew up in my face at 36, 37 [kilometres]. I didn't think I was running fast anymore and was just happy to be in third overall at that point. Then I came around the corner and saw the clock and was pleasantly surprised to have run a PB [personal best]."

Coolsaet did meet the Canadian Olympic standard of 2:11:29, and will be joined in London by Eric Gillis of Antigonish, N.S., his training partner at Speed River Track Club in Guelph, Ont.

Coolsaet posted his time despite having to take a washroom break at about the 25 km mark.

"It didn't take too much time but obviously I lost contact with the front pack," he said. "Luckily I had a pacer and clawed my way up the next three kilometres and got myself up with that front pack again."
Banner day for Canada

Gillis finished fourth Sunday in an unofficial time of 2:11:28 while Dylan Wykes turned in the third-best Canadian performance.

"I could've just as easily been one second over," said Gillis. "I feel really, really lucky to get that [Canadian Olympic] standard. I couldn't have done it this time last year, I just wasn't in the right frame of mind to go after that. Things are working out well now, things are clicking."

Kenneth Mungara of Kenya won Sunday's Toronto marathon for a fourth consecutive year. He finished in 2:09:51 and Ethiopia's Shami Abdulahi Dawit was second.

"This was a very good day for me but it was very tough because it was very windy and cold," Mungara said.

Coolsaet, who ran more than 200 km a week to prepare for Sunday's marathon, previously ran 2:11:22.5, but that was prior to the official London Olympic qualifying period.

At last year's Toronto marathon, the University of Guelph alumnus recorded the fifth-fastest marathon time for a Canadian.

Bruce Deacon is the last marathoner to represent Canada in the men's event at the 2000 Sydney Olympics, where he placed 44th.

Gillis, 31, ran for Canada at the 2008 Beijing Olympics and finished 33rd.

He moved to Guelph five years ago and made his marathon debut last year in Houston, where he posted a time of 2:13:52, more than two minutes longer than Sunday's performance.
Cool, blustery conditions

"It was not perfect out there [with the cool, blustery conditions]," Gillis told Russell after the Toronto marathon, "but we did what we had to do."

Gillis said despite the weather conditions, he felt very good physically through the first 34 kilometres of the race and was on pace to qualify for London comfortably. But that all changed near the end.

"With 300 metres to go, I wasn't sure," he said. "I just knew I had to put my head down and get up on my toes as much as I could.

"The support [in Toronto] is amazing," Gillis told the CBC. "This is officially a big-city race. I welcome everyone to come, either race, participate, watch, raise money. It's an amazing event."

Coolsaet said also having Gillis qualify for London will prove beneficial to both runners.

"Just the fact that now we can work together for the same marathon again is a huge benefit for both of us," he said. "It works both ways and we're really excited to be able to focus on London from here on in."

Ethiopia's Koren Yal was the top female finisher in 2:22.43, with compatriot Mare Dibaba second in 2:23.25. Vancouver's Katherine Moore was eighth in 2:48.48.

Meanwhile, police said a 27-year-old man died after collapsing while running in the event. He was taken to St. Michael's Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

49ers Win One Battle, Then Start Another

There was a time — last season, for instance — when a game between the Detroit Lions and the San Francisco 49ers would have meant so little that it would have elicited a shrug and a snooze. That was then, when the teams started the season a combined 1-9.

This is now, when a melee breaks out after the game because the coaches — the head coaches — nearly come to blows. The 49ers’ 25-19 victory over the Lions on Sunday gave the Lions (5-1) their first loss and solidified the 49ers (5-1) as one of the biggest surprises of the season. It was messy (21 penalties) and it was physical (seven sacks).

And that was before the postgame handshake, which required a tale of the tape.

Jim Harbaugh, San Francisco’s coach, and Jim Schwartz, Detroit’s coach, briefly crossed paths much earlier in their careers when both were with the Baltimore Ravens — Harbaugh as a quarterback, Schwartz as a defensive assistant. Now they are widely respected young coaches leading teams on the rise. Their shared experience apparently did not ensure that they could get through the most rudimentary part of the game without incident.

Harbaugh, who also had a handshake kerfuffle with Seattle’s Pete Carroll when both were college coaches, was gleeful about his team’s victory as he approached Schwartz. That was when he wound up for a big, roundhouse hand slap, a haymaker of a handshake.

“It was totally on me — too hard a handshake,” Harbaugh said. “It was a strong kind of slap kind of handshake.”

Schwartz, looking a little stunned, apparently did not appreciate Harbaugh’s enthusiasm because as Harbaugh turned to run off the field, Schwartz gave chase and jostled with him.

“Didn’t expect an obscenity at that point, so it was a surprise to me at the end of the game,” Schwartz said. “Obviously, you win a game like that, you’re excited and things like that, but I think there’s a protocol that goes with this league.”

The new protocol could include having a buffer zone between coaches. As players from both teams headed for the tunnel to the locker rooms, the crowd — and the anger — grew. Finally, the 49ers public-relations official Bob Lange positioned himself between the two coaches and moved Harbaugh away while a 49ers player shoved Schwartz aside.

Harbaugh said that when he saw Schwartz in the tunnel, he told him that he shook his hand too hard and that the moment was his fault. He did not apologize. The N.F.L. said it would review the incident.

Harbaugh, who had been sought after by college and professional teams alike before leaving Stanford after last season to coach the 49ers, has transformed them in his own image, infusing them with a confidence and commitment that his quarterback, Alex Smith, said he had never seen in the N.F.L. They are in prime position to win the N.F.C. West, which was won last season by Carroll’s Seahawks with a losing record as the 49ers finished 6-10.

“A year ago, games like this we lost,” said tight end Delanie Walker, who caught a 6-yard touchdown pass on fourth down with 1 minute 51 seconds to play that gave San Francisco the lead in the fourth quarter. “That’s the turnaround. All of it comes from the coach. The way he acts. He was sure fired up. Jim Harbaugh is one of those guys who is always fired up.”

Harbaugh had plenty to be fired up about. The 49ers sacked Matthew Stafford five times and forced him into off-kilter, off-target throws throughout the game. They neutralized receiver Calvin Johnson, who had entered the game with nine touchdown catches but was kept out of the end zone Sunday.

The 49ers also had a balanced offense that included 203 rushing yards — exposing the Lions’ biggest weakness. And Harbaugh got a rocket of a touchdown pass from Smith to Walker. That reaffirmed Harbaugh’s decision to place the team in the hands of Smith, a former No. 1 overall draft pick, even though his career had been largely left for dead by previous San Francisco coaches.

It all came together to give the 49ers their third fourth-quarter comeback victory on the road this season, prompting Harbaugh to say he feels “something special is brewing here.”

Perhaps so. This victory was a significant one for the 49ers — probably more important to them than it would have been to the Lions, who have already been accepted as legitimate contenders.

But it will be overshadowed, at least for a few days, by Harbaugh’s actions. Harbaugh was asked if his emotions might eventually undermine his coaching. A wide smile spread across his face.

“We’ll see; I don’t think I’m that emotional,” he started, before pausing. “I will say I was very emotional about our team. When you’re with a group of guys and you’re trying to do something special, to see your guys play that way — yeah, it fires you up. It fires me up. I don’t apologize for that. If that offends you or anybody else, so be it.”

NFL Scores Week 6: 49ers Come Back, Win 25-19 Thriller Against Lions

San Francisco came back to beat Detroit behind Alex Smith. But Jim Harbaugh's demonstrative celebration didn't sit well with Jim Schwartz.

Oct 16, 2011 - Alex Smith's finest moment as the 49ers' franchise quarterback may have come in San Francisco's 25-19 win over Detroit on Sunday. But chances are that Jim Schwartz' postgame altercation with Jim Harbaugh will be the talk of the NFL pundit class for the next few days.

Smith threw for just 125 yards, but led the Niners down the field late and found Delanie Walker for the game-winning touchdown pass with less than two minutes to go in the fourth quarter. Frank Gore helped the Niners, too, with 141 rushing yards and a touchdown.

But Schwartz took exception to what he saw as Harbaugh's excessive celebration, and went after the first-year San Francisco coach after a brusque postgame handshake. Schwartz and Harbaugh had to be separated, but it appeared that Schwartz was the aggressor throughout.

With the win, the Niners move to 5-1 for the first time since 1998, while the Lions fall from the ranks of the unbeatens, dropping to 5-1 with the loss and leaving NFC North rival Green Bay as the only team with a blemish-free record.

Matthew Stafford threw for 293 yards and two touchdowns in the losing effort, and Calvin Johnson, who had seven catches for 113 yards, failed to catch a touchdown pass for the first time in the 2011 season. The Lions didn't score after Stafford found Nate Burleson for a go-ahead touchdown early in the fourth quarter.

England Tour of India 2011 Schedule

England team who performed exceptionally well against India in the test and one day series on their backyard will travel to India for five match ODI series and one off twenty20 internationals.

England tour will start with two tour games on 8th and 11th of October 2011. They will play first ODI at Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad on October 14th 2011. While 2nd, 3rd, 4th and final ODI’s will be played on 17th, 20th, 23rd and 25th of October 2011 at Delhi, Mohali, Mumbai and Kolkata.

Kolkata will also host only twenty20 internationals to be played between India and England on October 29th 2011.

India v England complete Fixtures Series 2011 Fixtures (All timings are mentioned in GMT+05:30)

Timing

Teams

Venue

Results

Sat 8 Oct

09:30 AM

Tour Game - TBC v England

Gymkhana Ground, Hyderabad


Tue 11 Oct

09:30 AM

Tour Game - TBC v England

Gymkhana Ground, Hyderabad


Fri 14 Oct (D/N)

14:30 PM

1st ODI - India v England

Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad


Mon 17 Oct (D/N)

14:30 PM

2nd ODI - India v England

Feroz Shah Kotla, Delhi


Thu 20 Oct (D/N)

14:30 PM

3rd ODI - India v England

Punjab Cricket Association Stadium, Mohali, Chandigarh


Sun 23 Oct (D/N)

14:30 PM

4th ODI - India v England

Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai


Tue 25 Oct (D/N)

14:30 PM

5th ODI - India v England

Eden Gardens, Kolkata


Sat 29 Oct (D/N)

20:00 PM

T20I - India v England

Eden Gardens, Kolkata

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Liverpool v Manchester United - as it happened

"I have always considered Manchester United versus Liverpool to be the game of the season in English football," says Sir Alex Ferguson. "We are talking about the two most successful clubs in England historically, and a rivalry that goes back to how industry changed when they opened the Manchester Ship Canal."

You can't really argue with him - the fixtures between the two teams are always huge - but that's not going to stop the gloriously stubborn Kenny Dalglish trying. "If that is what he thinks then fine. That is up to Fergie. For me, I've always said the most important game is the next one. It's Manchester United this time and next week it will be Norwich City."

Kick off in the big Liverpool v Norwich City clash: 5.30pm, Saturday 22 October.

In the meantime: United are at Anfield today, match starting at 12.45pm.

Now, despite United starting the season strongly, and Liverpool stuttering a wee bit, the home side will fancy their chances today. They've won their last three home league games against United, their best run since a streak of nine in a row between 1970/71 and 1979/80. The last time the teams met, Dirk Kuyt scored a hat-trick in this fixture last season, a game in which Luis Suarez was sensational. But United are due one against Liverpool at Anfield, where they've not won since December 2007, Carlos Tevez scoring the winner. And here's a different way to analyse the recent form in this fixture: John O'Shea scored a last-minute winner the season before that, so suddenly United's record at the home of their bitter rivals is two wins from five matches, which doesn't look bad at all.

While we're waiting, you'll do well to read this piece on Steven Gerrard by the magnificent Barney Ronay: Steven Gerrard is a period piece out of kilter with modern mores. And what a headline. Only in the Guardian, eh.

Steven Gerrard starts his first match for Liverpool since this corresponding fixture last season: Reina, Kelly, Carragher, Skrtel, Jose Enrique, Kuyt, Lucas, Adam, Downing, Gerrard, Suarez.
Subs: Doni, Agger, Carroll, Henderson, Spearing, Bellamy, Robinson.

Wayne Rooney on the bench for Manchester United, with Phil Jones in midfield: De Gea, Smalling, Ferdinand, Evans, Evra, Young, Jones, Fletcher, Park, Giggs, Welbeck.
Subs: Lindegaard, Anderson, Rooney, Hernandez, Carrick, Nani, Valencia.

The omens are good for a United win, you'd have to say, because doubts are being raised regarding Ferguson's slightly idiosyncratic selection, and we all know how these scenarios usually pan out for British football's most prolific trophy gatherer. "Massive, massive gamble by Sir Alex," writes Dr Manoj Joseph. "Looks like we are aiming for a draw here what with Rooney, Nani and Hernandez all on the bench. It'll be a proper miracle if we manage a win with that first team. And what's with the subs bench? Not one defender in that lot." Meanwhile Owen Cameron splutters: "Evans and a recovering Ferdinand in central defence? If you don't have money on Suarez to score, you've got a philosophical objection to gambling."

Shameless plug / charity appeal. "I was wondering if I could be really cheeky and ask for a plug for my new book, which is out on Monday?" asks Benjamin Hendy. Floor's yours, sir. "It's called How To Fill A Black Hole and it's a children's sci-fi adventure for 9-12 year olds (though I've found plenty of adults who've enjoyed it too). If people head over to my publisher's website, www.milliwaysbooks.com, they can download the first three chapters for free and if they order a copy from there, £1 of their purchase price will go to Southampton Hospital Charity's Children's Services Funds. So not only would they be getting a rip-roaring read, they'd be helping out sick children too. What's not to love?"

The teams are out! Liverpool take to the pitch in their trademark all-red strip, United are playing in a blue-and-black hooped affair. Both teams ticking aesthetic boxes in my book. As you'd imagine, there's a belter of an atmosphere at Anfield. Let's hope we get a game to match. Come along, now, everyone, play nicely.

And we're off! United set the ball rolling, and will be kicking towards the Kop in the first half. That suggests Steven Gerrard won the toss, as that's just how Liverpool like it. Incidentally, our man in Manchester, Danny Taylor, reports that Sir Alex Ferguson confirms he's taken Rooney out because 'he's devastated by his suspension'.

2 min: It's all nervous passes, hoofs, and aimless headers at the moment. Biggest fixture in the best league in the world! Still, plenty of time to get this baby moving on an upward curve. "As a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers," begins - who else? - Ryan Dunne, "I was delighted when Fergie said yesterday that the Old Firm Rammy is superior to el Clasico! Do the boys in the press box agree?" I'm sure they will now Fergie's told them what to think. Mind you, they'd be right to do so, of course. Here's what the United manager said: "Are you saying [the Liverpool and United fixture] is not as good as Barcelona-Real Madrid? You know the difference? Barcelona is one end of the country, Madrid the other, and the fans don't travel. The only rivalry you could compare the Liverpool game to is Rangers-Celtic."

3 min: Downing sprays a tasty ball out right to Gerrard, who nearly breaks past Evra. His efforts look like winning a corner, but Evra slides in and kicks the ball off Gerrard's beak - a proper comedy basic, perfectly executed, it could only be bettered with the honk of a horn - and out for a goal kick.

4 min: A long ball down the middle by United. Welbeck flicks on, and so nearly finds Young, on the edge of the area, but Reina comes out to collect. It's very sunny at Anfield today, the keeper squinting into the distance.

6 min: Lucas breaks into acres of space in the United half, Adam having won the ball well in midfield. It's classic nosebleed stuff from Lucas, though, who freezes as he nears the area and opts to lay off to Kuyt, who wastes possession. That was a chance to at least get a shot on target, but nothing came of it.

8 min: Smalling slips down the Liverpool left to allow Jose Enrique to reach the byline. The resulting cross goes nowhere. "I hope Benjamin Hendy put more effort into his book than he did into his cheeky requests for a plug, as that's word-for-word what appeared in yesterday's OBO," writes Allan Hobbs. "Lazy. (What are the rules on plagiarising one's own work, I wonder?)" I have no idea, but I've just recycled exactly the same nose-honking riff I trotted out in this morning's rugby MBM, something that wasn't even worth using in the first place, never mind copying, so you'll not hear me picking up Mr Hendy about it.

10 min: United ping a few triangles together down the inside-right channel. Welbeck eventually gets a shot away, but it's weak, and deflected, and gathered by Reina. A little opening there for a minute, though. "Liverpool had an unbeaten streak of nine in a row between 1970/71 and 1979/80, but seven wins in a row from 72/73 to 79/80," corrects Mac Millings. "Sorry, but I have nothing better to do. Well, I suppose I could act like a competent parent by breaking up my children's current round of combat, but, well, y'know."

12 min: Ferdinand needlessly brings down Suarez under a high ball, 25 yards out, just to the left of goal. Gerrard floats a free kick into the area, but it's easily headed clear by Evra. This is a bright opening by both teams, without either keeper having to make a save.

13 min: Downing versus Evra down the right could become interesting. Downing nearly zips past his man into acres, but opts to go to ground instead, looking for a free kick. Evra is beside himself with rage, and demands the referee show the Liverpool winger a yellow card for diving. Now now, everyone, play nicely.

14 min: Kelly is penalised for, well, not very much down the United left. Level with the edge of the area, Young whips a dangerous ball towards the far post; Reina, peering cautiously into the sun, claims well. That was clever play by Young, fishing for a mistake, as Reina appears to be struggling to see what's going on at the moment.

16 min: Brilliance from Evra, who zips down the left after a ball he should never have a hope in hell of reaching. But reach it he does, whipping a cross to the far post for Jones, who heads into the side netting. Liverpool were all over the shop at the back there, ripped asunder by Evra and the increasingly impressive Jones, who set the whole move off in the first place.

18 min: Anfield has gone quiet, with United slowly gaining the ascendency. A lovely bit of crowd despair slipped through the net on Sky Sports; a terribly desperate Scouse cry of "this is shite". "Is it always the work experience who sets up the pitchside microphones for Sky?" asks Ronan Leonard. "Or some scamp who just loves people getting to swear on air? Bet he loved Black Grape on TFI Friday'."

21 min: Downing finally gets the crowd going, taking a shot from the edge of the area. It's deflected out of play, to the left of the goal, for a corner. Adam takes it quickly, allowing Gerrard to whip a delightful ball right through the United six-yard box. De Gea having been attracted to his near post, the goal is unguarded and gaping, but Suarez and Kuyt are, respectively, nowhere near the ball and facing the wrong way, and the ball flies out on the right.

24 min: It's very quiet at Anfield now. Unsurprising, really, as nothing much is going on. But United will be happy enough with this.

25 min: Suarez has a dig from the halfway line, but his shot curls wide right and high. De Gea wasn't in prime position there, so it wasn't too daft a thing to do.

27 min: A couple of decent crosses into the United area, first by Kelly down the right, then by Jose Enrique down the left. Both times, Ferdinand heads clear strongly. Decent play all round. "So in Rooney and Carroll, you've got two strikers on the bench with a combined total value of over £60m," notes Mark Scott. "That is of course of course if like me, you value Rooney at £55m and Carroll at £5m."

28 min: A booking for Liverpool. I'm not sure who it's to: either for Skrtel on Welbeck, or Lucas on Park. I'll get back to you about that, perhaps when one of them gets sent off. One thing I will say; neither challenge was particularly meaty, late and clumsy clips but nothing else.

30 min: Suarez turns Ferdinand inside and out like an old sock. He wins a corner down the left. Liverpool load the United box for the corner, but it's scrambled clear. United break upfield through Giggs, who sends a long ball up to Welbeck, the United striker nearly breaking free down the right. He's eventually relieved of the ball by Lucas. After a quiet few minutes, the pace of the game is picking up a wee bit again.

31 min: The booking was for Lucas. He'll miss Dalglish's game of the season against Norwich next week.

32 min: Gerrard is found in acres of space down the right, but as he shapes to cross, he slips, and balloons the ball into the Anfield Road end. "That's why I have missed Gerrard," writes Graeme Neill. "Those aimless, chance squandering shanks into Row Z. Welcome back Stevie!"

35 min: The first real chance of the match falls to Liverpool. Adam takes a shot, which deflects off Evans and breaks to Suarez on the edge of the area. He drops a shoulder, sending Evans sliding out of the way, but can't squeeze the ball into the bottom-right corner past De Gea, who clears with his shins. A real chance, hit straight at the keeper (who nevertheless did very well indeed).

37 min: Lucas gives the ball away in midfield. Young bombs forward, eventually finding Welbeck. The ball's fed out to Giggs on the left, then back inside to Jones, who slips an inviting pass down the inside-right channel for Fletcher. The Scotland captain takes a shot, but it squirms well wide left of the target.

40 min: Skrtel turns into Frnz Bcknbr for a minute, rampaging all the way up the field and into the United box. He's ushered out of play on the left by Ferdinand. Wonderful play all round.

41 min: Park robs Adam down the right and hares off down the pitch, cutting inside, then launching a shot wide left of goal. Fantastic play from the United midfielder. "Does anyone know what compels a manager to wear a suit for one match and then a tracksuit for the next?" wonders Owen Coyle Patrick Armitage. "This is a big match, Kenny. Try and class it up a bit."

43 min: Young is booked for upending Gerrard down the right as the Liverpool captain tries to nip between the United man and his team-mate Evra. A dangerous free kick for Liverpool, just to the right of the United area. Adam whips it in; De Gea punches it out.

44 min: A clash of heads between Jones and Lucas, both men requiring treatment. It was accidental, the Manchester United player coming off worse, falling to the ground immediately. Lucas took a while before hitting the turf, but hit it he did, perhaps worried that he'd pick up a second yellow.

45 min: Jones is still off the pitch getting treatment, though not for the clash of heads; he's got a bit of knee knack. There will be two minutes of injury time at the end of this half.

HALF TIME: Liverpool 0-0 Manchester United. Jones comes back on the pitch to complete the half, but he's moving around very gingerly. United will want a good look at him during the half-time break. And that's that for the half. Not much to report there, to be honest, De Gea making the only save from Suarez. "Kenny's probably saving the suit for the Norwich game," suggests Sophie Pearson.

And we're off again! Liverpool set the ball rolling, launching it long, and losing it almost immediately. Jones is fit to continue for United, at least for the moment. Meanwhile we might be on our way to the first MBM divorce. "Bloody hell, this is Sophie Pearson's husband who thought of that brilliant bit of humour about Kenny's suit, but sent it from the wifey's iPad," writes Matt Pearson. "Credit where credit's due etc etc." Make sure you tell us when the decree absolute arrives, now.

47 min: Young has a thrash from distance, but his shot is dragged miles wide left. "This break-away-from-the-TV-deal plan of Liverpool's must be taking a further blow today," writes Oliver Lewis. "Why would Liverpool and Man U deserve more TV money after this? Norwich next week of course would be in for a windfall."

48 min: A free kick for United, 25 yards out, just to the left. Reina parries Young's effort, but lets the ball clatter off his shins. He's very fortunate that the ball rolls past the nearby Welbeck, instead of to the striker's feet, allowing the keeper to scamper after it and claim.

50 min: To the left of the United goal, Suarez twists through 360 degrees to flummox Smalling. He's momentarily clear, but the ball's eventually bundled out of play. From the corner on the left, Kuyt heads goalwards from the penalty spot, the ball striking Evans on the top of his left arm. Seen them given, and all that, but that would have been extremely harsh.

51 min: Down the right, Young cuts inside and unleashes a low shot that crosses the face of goal and flies out to the left. The referee decides Reina fingertipped the ball out of play. Not sure about that. The corner's given, nevertheless, but nothing comes of it, so there'll be no controversy here.

53 min: Ferdinand is booked for coming through the back of Suarez. There hasn't been much in any of these bookings, you know. It's not been that sort of game, played in a good spirit so far. The resulting free kick, from out on the left, nearly finds Suarez in the area, but the striker can't time his leap, bustled out of it by a couple of determined United challenges.

56 min: Gerrard bombs down the left. He has a shot from a tight angle, but it's easily claimed by De Gea. Here's Jonathan Holland on Sir Alex's comment about the Manchester Ship Canal: "You can bet that if they'd called it the Liverpool Ship Canal, he wouldn't have mentioned it."

57 min: A change for Liverpool: Lucas off, Jordan Henderson on. "Am I hearing things or does someone have an old fashioned footie rattle at the game?" wonders Simon McMahon. You could be right, you know. "Well done. I hope they're wearing a flat cap too."

58 min: Corner for Liverpool, down the left. It's swung to the far post, where Skrtel contests, but Smllng clears. Suarez and Evra tussle down the right. Suarez catches Evra on the knee as the two battle for the ball at high pace. Evra twists and turns in agony, winning a free kick. No punishment for Suarez - correctly - but Evra doesn't see it that way. He's got that look in his eye, suggesting this isn't over.

60 min: Suarez has a shot from 35 yards. It nearly clears the Kop. "Rio Ferdinand has the air of Brian Glover in Kes," writes Gary Naylor. "He's full of bluster and a sense of entitlement, but he's too old and too slow."

63 min: Suarez pickpockets Fletcher on the edge of the area. He really is a bustling menace. He skitters into the area and takes a shot that's deflected wide left. Corner. Which is coming in a minute, as play stops awhile for Suarez and Evra to get on each other's nerves in the box. The referee has a word. As the pair walk off from their lecture, Suarez pats Evra on the head, ostensibly in a friendly manner, sending the United full back into a blistering rage. The corner is dealt with by United, but Evra begins a new argument with Kuyt, and picks up a preposterous booking. He was played there, totally grifted.

66 min: Adam sashays, as much as Adam can sashay, down the inside right channel. His little toe is clipped by Ferdinand as he goes past; free kick. No booking, though, which is something of an escape for the defender, and for United, as he's already been booked.

68 min: GOAL!!! Liverpool 1-0 Manchester United. Not that much of an escape, though. Gerrard takes the free kick, just to the right of the D. He hits the ball straight at the wall - but Giggs peels away from Welbeck, allowing the ball to sail through and fly into the right-hand side of De Gea's unguarded net. That almost qualifies as an assist for Giggs, so elementary was the mistake.

69 min: An immediate double change for United: Nani and Wayne Rooney come on for Young and Park. Meanwhile the tumult in the Pearson household continues apace. "Actually I thought of it but my parents are trying to grab all the glory," writes Zak Pearson (age 11.5). Eleven point five?

71 min: The tempo's suddenly super-high, the atmosphere buzzing. Balls are flung into the area at each end of the pitch; all pretty aimless, though. "Evra does get a good righteous funk on, doesn't he?" observes Joe Pearson. "He kissed his badge at the Anfield crowd, telling them perhaps to 'funk off'. As far as I know, I'm not related to Matt and Sophie."

73 min: Liverpool are suddenly sitting back a bit, which might not be such a good idea against free-scoring United, especially now Rooney and Nani are on. Ferdinand sends a beautiful raking ball down the right; Smalling lets the ball go under his foot, just as it looked like he would break into space.

75 min: Adam tenaciously wins the ball down the left, but his chipped ball forward to release Suarez is too strong, and De Gea is out to claim.

76 min: Nani spins in a central position, 25 yards out centrally, and earns himself a shooting opportunity. He hoicks it miles over the bar, though.

77 min: A final change for United, who you suspect will be in Kitchen Sink mode for the next quarter of an hour or so. Hernandez comes on for Jones. Since the goal, United have enjoyed 70% of possession.

79 min: Nani and Evans struggle to get the ball under control down the United right, just inside the Liverpool area. Jose Enrique comes in to clear, although the ball hits the top of his arm, then clanks off his hand, while he does so. Similar to the Evans incident earlier, in that the ball was played off him at such close range, it would have been a very harsh decision. But again, they've been given.

81 min: GOAL!!! Liverpool 1-1 Manchester United. A corner for United down the left. It's zipped towards the near post, where Welbeck glances a header on. Welbeck's intervention has Liverpool's back line all over the shop, and Hernandez zips in to hammer a header home from close range. That's a magnificently worked corner.

82 min: What a save by De Gea! Downing curls in a low cross from the left. Kuyt sticks a leg up at the far post, directing the ball towards the bottom-right corner. But the keeper is across to parry out for a corner. Wonderful goalkeeping. From the resulting set piece, there's a scramble at the far post after a not-so-wonderful flap from De Gea, but neither Downing nor Kuyt can get a shot away. United clear.

84 min: Both teams are going for the winner. United press Liverpool back awhile, but can't find a pass in the final third. Downing goes at Smalling down the left, but the United full back keeps tight to his man. There's some tension within Anfield now.

85 min: For a second, it looks like Suarez is clear down the inside-right channel, but he fails to control, and he's offside anyway. This is pelting along at some pace now. If only the whole game had been like this.

87 min: Kelly and Giggs collide down the right. Both men stay on their feet, and keep running. Neither look for a free kick. That's the first time that has happened in the Premier League since 1997.

88 min: Cutting in from the left, Downing looks for the top-right corner from 25 yards. His rising screamer isn't too far off, but clears the bar and sails into the Kop. A decent attempt from a player yet to open his account for his new club.

89 min: Fletcher upends Suarez, who had controlled a long ball down the inside-right channel, 30 yards out. Gerrard dinks the most aimless free kick you'll ever see into the United area; it's cleared with ease.

90 min: Henderson races after a ball bouncing down the inside-right channel. He loops a first-time effort towards the top-left. It's heading in, but De Gea scampers back to claw the ball out for a corner. Magnificent play all round. From the corner, another corner. And from that, Suarez and Rooney compete for a header six yards out; Rooney wins the battle, and Skrtel slashes a wild shot into the Kop.

90 min +2: In the second of three minutes of injury time, Henderson heads a cross from the left over the bar from eight yards. That was a magnificent chance to win this game.

FULL TIME: Liverpool 1-1 Manchester United. And that's that. United end their losing streak here; Liverpool extend their unbeaten run. Henderson had chances at the end to win the game, but a draw is a fair result. No controversies, unless you're spoiling for a fight, which is nice. Warm handshakes all round, the game having been played in a fine spirit for once. There's nice.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Rugby World Cup 2011: How the Jackals can have their day

Wales are going up in the world. No doubt about it. Thursday night's team meal ahead of Saturday's semi-final was at the top of the Sky Tower – a kind of Post Office Tower with knobs on, which dominates the Auckland skyline. You feel like you're 1,000 feet in the air. And the food's not bad either. If this is the price you pay for success I could get used to it.

Who would have thought you could dine out on defence? But that's the way this tournament is going with attention increasingly on the Jackals – the Richie McCaws, David Pococks and Sam Warburtons of the World Cup, who are proving you don't have to have all the ball to win games. I know; the first time you say it, it's a bit like telling someone that water can flow up hill. But I'm prepared to give examples.

In 2004 Wasps beat Toulouse and won the Heineken Cup when it seemed as though we only had about 30% of possession. Then in the 2007 World Cup quarter-final in Cardiff, France beat New Zealand by making something like 200 tackles – pretty much a record for those like me who store such stats – but then last weekend Australia beat South Africa without hardly touching the ball the day after Wales blunted Ireland's attack.

So far in this tournament, Wales have conceded an average of eight points a game. Repeat that against France on Saturday – a big ask, as they say down here – and I'm told we will be the finalists with the lowest average in the 24 years of the cup.

More relevantly, you need to understand why rugby union is different. In the sport that I played most – rugby league – there is no way a side with 30% possession could come out on top in a game between two otherwise evenly matched sides. But in union it can be harder, more exhausting having the ball and keeping it than trying to win it.

Consider the breakdown: the attacking side frequently has to use more resources keeping the ball. There's the ball carrier, probably three guys supporting him and clearing out the ruck, plus a scrum-half to distribute the ball and keep the move going. Five players, as opposed to the defence, which may commit only the one man.

The All Blacks are a perfect example, frequently seeming not to bother at the breakdown, sending just the one or two men. Then, when they sense something's on, they pile in, rip the ball and are in perfect shape, with a broken field ahead, to launch an attack.

But then again, there are differing kinds of defence and teams have defensive strategies, just as they have planned attacking moves.

Four years ago France beat the All Blacks by double-tackling the ball carrier. They wanted to stop the Blacks' offloading game, so one man went low while the other went high, pinning the ball carrier's arms. They frustrated a big part of the All Black game and we all know what happened. It's become part of New Zealand folklore.

We play to our strengths which is a back row – Warburton, Dan Lydiate and Toby Faletau – all of whom are ball winners, plus a couple of extra Jackals from the front row in Gethin Jenkins and Huw Bennett, who are better than most when it comes to ripping and winning the ball. In effect we have five back-rowers in the pack and a few more knocking around in midfield, so we tailor our game to suit them.Against Ireland we brushed up on our leg tackling, concentrating on getting their big men to the ground quickly so the Jackals could get at them while on attack we worked on frustrating the Irish defence plan.

Ireland have had considerable success with their particular style of defence which involves keeping the ball carrier off the ground, denying the attacking side the benefits of the ruck. They are quite vocal in letting the ref know what's going on, shouting: "It's a maul, it's a maul," just in case he thought otherwise.

Our idea was to frustrate the Irish by making sure we made a decent dent in their defence while at the same time guaranteeing our guys got to ground when tackled and we used an idea which is more often seen when sides are battering away at the try line. Teams like Italy frequently get another big man to "latch on" to the ball carrier, creating a 34-stone plus unit trying to break the line and pop the ball down.

We did something similar, but in other areas of the field, ensuring there was no way the Irish could stop our guys going to ground where the tacklers had to release. Then we were playing on our terms.

It's hardly rocket science, just another part of winning games. But what worked against Ireland might not be what's planned for France. It'll be worth getting up early to find out.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Remembering Matthew Shepard: 13 Years Later

October is LGBT History Month. It's also the month that we remember the life and tragic death of a young man that brought hate crimes into sharp focus for a nation that, at the time, didn't want to talk about the subject. Thirteen years ago, on Oct. 12, 21-year-old Matthew Shepard died after a brutal attack in Laramie, Wyo. In the words of his parents, who started the Matthew Shepard Foundation in his memory:

The story of Matthew Shepard began on December 1, 1976 when he was born to Judy and Dennis Shepard in Casper, Wyoming. He went to public school in Casper until his junior year of high school when he moved with his family to Saudi Arabia. Matt had to finish his high school education at The American School in Switzerland because there were no American high schools in Saudi Arabia at the time. In both high schools, he was elected by his peers to be a peer counselor. He was easy to talk to, made friends easily and actively fought for the acceptance of all people. Matt had a great passion for equality. His experiences abroad fueled his love for travel and gave him the chance to make many new friends from around the world. Matt's college career eventually took him back to Wyoming where he studied political science, foreign relations and languages at the University of Wyoming in Laramie.


The horrific events that took place shortly after midnight on October 7, 1998 went against everything that Matt embodied. Two men, Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson, led him to a remote area east of Laramie, Wyoming. He was tied to a split-rail fence where the two men severely assaulted him. He was beaten and left to die in the cold of the night. Almost 18 hours later, he was found by a bicyclist who initially mistook him for a scarecrow. Matt died on October 12 at 12:53 a.m. at Poudre Valley Hospital in Fort Collins, Colorado with his family by his side. His memorial service was attended by friends and family from around the world and garnered immense media attention that brought Matt's story to the forefront of the fight against bigotry and hate. The life and death of Matthew Shepard changed the way we talk about, and deal with, hate in America. Since his death, Matt's legacy has challenged and inspired millions of individuals to erase hate in all its forms. Although Matt's life was short, his story continues to have a great impact on young and old alike. His legacy lives on in thousands of people like you who actively fight to replace hate with understanding, compassion and acceptance.

The violent death of this young man catapulted LGBT-based hate crimes into the national dialogue and international spotlight. For the first time, many in our country and around the world saw the very real danger gay people faced from bias-motivated crimes. The public also got its first good look at odious organizations like Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church, who protested Matthew Shepard's funeral and the trial. The horrific reactions and protestations of people like Phelps put a public and televised face on pure hatred and bigotry, which really changed the dialogue around LGBT people. They saw what pure anti-gay hatred looked like, and it changed the debate about hate crimes and gay rights forever.

But the response against the brutal murder was also history-making. Hours after the death of Matthew Shepard, President Bill Clinton went onto the White House lawn to tell reporters: "In our shock and grief one thing must remain clear: hate and prejudice are not American values."

The senseless murder of a young man, combined with unprecedented media attention and an energized LGBT community, truly changed the course of the equality movement. The nation had a face to put on the nameless numbers and statistics about LGBT-based hate crimes and also had the opposition, and their incendiary rhetoric, thrust into their face on the nightly news and in newspapers around the country. It led to more attention to LGBT issues, including media attention to other hate crimes like the murder of Gwen Araujo for being transgender, or the shooting of 15-year-old Lawrence King for his sexual orientation and gender expression.

The effect of Shepard's life and his family's activism came into sharp focus on Oct. 22, 2009, when the United States Congress passed The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, adding gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability to existing hate crimes laws. On Oct. 28, 2009, President Obama signed the act, the first ever piece of pro-LGBT federal legislation, into law.

On a personal note, the murder of Matthew Shepard was a defining moment for many LGBT people of my generation. As a young gay man, I looked at the pictures of his face and could see my own. His life and death inspired me, as I'm sure it did many others, to become involved in the fight against hate, bigotry and inequality.

It is important that we as a movement and as a society look back at our history, even dark times like the murder of Matthew Shepard. Learning from our past, seeing how keeping a memory alive can effect such dramatic change, and how a life can inspire generations are important moments for reflection.

London ceremony must be over by midnight: IOC

The opening ceremony of next year's London Olympics must finish by midnight so athletes will be encouraged to march and still get to bed at a reasonable hour, the IOC said Friday.

Denis Oswald, head of the International Olympic Committee's coordination commission for London, said arrangements should also be made to allow athletes to leave before the end of the ceremony.

Some athletes at recent Olympic opening ceremonies have complained they have to stand for hours as the show ran over the scheduled time. Thousands of athletes from more than 200 countries will be marching into London's Olympic Stadium on July 27, 2012.

The London ceremony, directed by Oscar-winning filmmaker Danny Boyle, is expected to start around 9 p.m.

"We insisted the ceremony should not finish after midnight so the athletes can get to the Olympic village quickly," Oswald said at the close of a three-day visit to check on games' preparations. "They can even leave the opening ceremony before the end if they wish to do so."

The length of the ceremony will also affect the 80,000 spectators trying to get home before public transport closes at 1:30 a.m.

Many Olympic athletes choose not to take part in opening ceremonies, especially those competing on the following day.

"It's a choice that you make but we would like to have an opening ceremony with as many athletes as possible, and that's why we insisted that the ceremony would be over at midnight at the latest," Oswald said.

Paul Deighton, chief executive of London organizing committee LOCOG, said athletes should have little problem getting in and out of the stadium because the village is located within walking distance of the Olympic Park in east London.

"The timing and logistics work very much in our favor," he said.

The IOC commission made its next-to-last visit to London before the Olympics. The final inspection will take place from March 28-30.

"We have once again been impressed by the overall level of planning and by the results of the first group of test events that were held this summer," Oswald said.

It was the panel's first visit since the riots that swept London in August, violence that tarnished the international image of the host city less than a year before the games.

Oswald said the riots had been brought "under control very quickly."

"It's something you often find in large cities, but I don't think that this has put any negative image on London or the games," he said.

The IOC panel also received an update on transportation plans for the Games, a priority issue because of the huge stress that will be put on the city's already stretched public transit system.

"I can say that at this stage a lot of progress has been made and a lot of additional information has been given," Oswald said. "This is a situation we will have to follow very cautiously until the end."

On a separate issue, Oswald said the IOC supports the British Olympic Association's right to enforce a lifetime Olympic ban on British doping offenders. Among those covered by the rule are sprinter Dwain Chambers and cyclist David Millar.

"We fully understand that the BOA has that rule and has had it for a number of years," Oswald said. "We fully respect the autonomy of the BOA to establish this eligibility rule."

On Thursday, the Court of Arbitration for Sport threw out an IOC rule that would have banned any athlete with a doping sanction of more than six months from competing in London. The verdict cleared American 400-meter runner LaShawn Merritt to defend his Olympic title next year.

Oswald said the CAS ruling wouldn't weaken the anti-doping effort in London because the IOC rule was only adopted in 2008 and had not yet been applied at any summer games. More than 5,000 athletes will be tested during the London Games.

"There is no reason to fear any added difficulties as compared to previous competitions," he said. "We have done the best we can to have the cleanest possible games."

London 2102 Olympics: Todd gives another masterclass to the young pretenders

One is  loath to tempt fate  with the show jumping still to come, but even if Mark Todd  does not win Boekelo three-day event tomorrow, it is increasingly difficult to bet against the 55-year-old claiming a fourth Olympic individual medal – 28 years after his first – at London 2012.

With NZB Campino,  a relative newcomer to this level, Todd led both after dressage and cross-country in Holland.  He is the only rider from the first two days to have remained in the top 10, after giving riders of all generations a lesson in bold but economical riding over Sue Benson’s trademark  accuracy fences.

Boekelo is a three-star event, a level  below Badminton and Burghley but always a  fantastically competitive  end to the horse trials season in northern Europe. It’s notable for starting a huge number of horses (110) from more nations (21) than any other comparable  competition; organisers say that 30 per cent of Boekelo runners always go on to the following year’s European championship or Olympic Games, and there will have been extra interest in getting a run this weekend, for Boekelo   is  the last opportunity for many to ride a track designed by Sue Benson before she unveils her Olympic cross-country  at Greenwich next summer.

In May, Todd rode another debutant, NZB Land Vision, to re-write his own extraordinary history by winning his fourth Badminton, 11 years after officially “retiring “ from eventing and going home to New Zealand to train racehorses.  Todd says it took a solid three years to get back to the riding standard he had left off.  His peers voted Todd “Rider of the 20th Century” after he’d apparently hung up his boots. He certainly warrants the billing, for as well as riding as well as ever he has seamlessly assimilated numerous technicalities that changed the character of eventing in his absence.

Boekelo always attracts numerous  Brits,  a mix of established riders with younger  horses ready to be asked  tough questions, and up and coming  riders aiming to cement their own credentials. This year’s was not memorable for the  19 who crossed the channel, with only five  British still in the top 30 after cross-country.

Best is Tina Cook, fifth overnight with De Novo News.  Cook has produced the horse  from his “baby”  days. He is not yet in the same league with his dressage but she will be thrilled to have a capable understudy for 2009 European champion Miners Frolic. The latter missed the 2011 season after suffering life-threatening colitis, which reduced him to a skeletal state, and while  Cook is simply happy he has he survived,  his ability to defend his 2008 Olympic individual bronze is inevitably unclear at this stage.

Domestic distractions may have meant that Zara Phillips did not have the best preparation for Boekelo with Lord Lauries, who won a one-day international in Ireland on his previous outing,  but Boekelo  was a step up both in distance and class  for this German-bred horse and they had a demoralising three refusals at “accuracy” fences when lying third overnight.  However, Phillips’ top string High Kingdom excelled on his  Burghley debut and has put her back in Olympic contention. Even if it’s back to the drawing board with Lord Lauries, she can still be satisfied with her best competitive season since  Toytown’s retirement.

Producing horses to this level is a long game and most major names accept there will be consecutive seasons on the sidelines as they train-up the next  equine generation.  The desire to be part of London 2012 is immense, though, and there is an unusual amount of gossip about negotiations between riders of rival nations  anxious to lease horses from each other for next year.

Two without this imminent worry are William Fox-Pitt and  Mary King, who have qualified over 12 horses between them already.  Missing Boekelo, they   make the long drive south on Monday  to the Pyrennees  where their  season-long tussle for both the world number one slot  and the HSBC Classics series prize comes to a conclusion at Pau.

2012 Olympics broadcast

Ericsson will bring the 2012 London Olympic Games to a global audience of almost 5 billion after supplying the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) with solutions for the delivery of coverage of the event, and other future sporting occasions, to broadcasters around the world.

This premium global sports content will be distributed to EBU members and other rights holders globally over both satellite and fibre networks in MPEG-2 Standard Definition (SD) or MPEG-4 AVC 4:2:2 High Definition (HD) using nearly 1,000 Ericsson RX8200 professional receivers.

This extends the relationship between the EBU and the Ericsson team, which has previously provided the EBU with solutions for major sporting occasions including the 2008 Games in Beijing, Tour De France, Wimbledon and European football.

“The EBU has over 60 years’ experience in delivering premium live content in a seamless, reliable and cost-effective way. We are delighted to extend our relationship with Ericsson for the 2012 Games – the biggest sporting event in the world – to allow us to provide our broadcast customers with the high-quality and flexible service they demand,” said Paolo Pusterla, Head of Procurement & Network Partnerships, EBU.

The EBU operates a global satellite and fibre network out of Geneva, Switzerland, covering all of Europe, the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region. The requirements of the broadcasters that it serves for differing equipment configurations and the many and varied ways in which receivers are used are driving the need for a flexible receiver platform. The Ericsson RX8200 Advanced Modular Receiver has been designed to precisely meet these requirements.

“The 2012 Games in London is one of those critical events for which reliability and quality are of absolute paramount importance to the viewer, and therefore to broadcasters as well,” said Staffan Pehrson, Vice-President and Head of Solution Area TV, Ericsson. “The Ericsson team has worked with the EBU for over 14 years on the world’s highest profile sports coverage, supplying the industry’s most advanced solutions for live event broadcasting.”

London 2012 Olympics: Sir Clive Woodward backs technology 'gamechanger' to deliver Olympic golds

Sir Clive Woodward is a man who most English rugby union fans would love to see come to the rescue of the national team after their disastrous World Cup campaign, but he is currently property of the British Olympic Association, where his innovations continue to produce results.

One of his slogans in his previous tenure as head coach of the England team, a time defined both by his methods and his victories, was typical of his efforts to do anything to gain an advantage: "If you win in IT, you tend to win".

Between 1998 and 2004 Woodward implemented a number of methods that raised eyebrows amongst his rivals but that ultimately gave England small "half a per cent" advantages over their opponents. He employed a vast backroom staff including coaches for specific aspects of the game (unheard of at the turn of the century): a masseur, a chef, and even a QC for any legal issues that arose on tours.

Woodward understood that to be the best rugby team in the world the England side had to be the fittest. So he completely revamped the players' health and conditioning habits. Under the advice of their nutritionist - another member of the backroom staff - the England team were put on a high protein diet that prohibited them from eating carbohydrates after lunch and recovery after matches and training was led by the use of ice baths to help halt the build up of lactic acid.

Sherylle Calder, the visualisation coach who had helped establish Australia as the dominant cricket team of the 1990s, was also brought on board by Woodward. She created a software program that players used in training and spoke with them on a one-on-one basis to try to increase their spatial awareness.


Jason Robinson, in tight fitting England kit, scorches over for a try in England's 2003 Rugby World Cup final win over Australia

Every detail was accounted for, even the rugby jerseys the team wore. Woodward had noticed that some of England's fastest players were being prevented from accelerating away because their opponents were able to tug at their jerseys. Their kit suppliers Nike were alerted to the complaint and England entered the World Cup clad in tight-fitting shirts that Woodward insists made his players harder to tackle.

At the Rugby Football Union he also introduced Prozone, an evaluation system that fed back from 12 cameras strapped to the roof of Twickenham, which allowed him to track all the performance levels of his players.

This, he says, allowed England to overtake their southern hemisphere rivals and become the best team in the world, winning the only World Cup victory by a northern hemisphere team in the tournament’s history.

Now in his role of director of elite performance at the BOA Woodward is at it again, determined to make Team GB the most technologically advanced outfit at the London Olympics.

And encouragingly for those who want to see GB athletes on the podium next year, he thinks he has the answer, thanks to the analysis software and storage products provided by a company called Dartfish. Little known outside professional sports, it is creating a minor revolution within them.

Woodward, in fact, rates the Dartfish technology, used by 22 of the BOA's Olympic sport teams, as highly as the Prozone software used on the way to Rugby World Cup victory.

"With England we understood how important technology was,” says Woodward. “So I implemented the use of Prozone and it allowed us to lead the way ahead of the Aussies and the Kiwis.

"We’ve now set up an IT hub down in Stratford where we're planning on getting live feeds from the all London 2012 events, and we're hoping to work with Dartfish in terms of the overall software programme that we're using."

The intention is for the BOA to use the live video footage provided by the Olympic Broadcasting Services during the Games and plug that footage into the Dartfish software. Coaches on the sidelines during live events are then able to watch and analyse the pictures using their iPhones and iPads and can make live decisions based on real-time performance.

London 2012, Atos launch Technology Operations Centre

The launch of the centre follows the first phase of London Prepares Series

London 2012 and Atos, the IT Partner for the Olympic and Paralympic Games, have launched the Technology Operations Centre.

The new centre is designed to be the mission control for all 94 Olympic competition and non-competition venues.

Atos said the launch of Technology Operations Centre follows the first phase of the London Prepares Series.

Technology Operations Centre monitors and controls the IT systems that deliver the results from all the Olympic and Paralympic sports competitions to the world's media in real time and Atos expects to process 30% more results data than in Beijing, said the company.

Atos predicts that the London Games are set with 8.5 billion PCs, smartphones and tablets connected to the Internet by 2012.

In this year's Summer Olympics, all 26 Olympic sports and 5 of the Paralympic sports have been added to the Commentator Information System (CIS). The CIS is managed, centrally from the Technology Operations Centre to enable commentators and journalists with touch-screen technology that gives results in real time.

Broadcasters will have access both in London and their home countries to the system for all Olympic and 5 Paralympic sports, said Atos.

When the Games are on, the Technology Operations Centre will operate at full capacity with about 450 business technologists covering 180 positions to manage and monitor the technology infrastructure and systems including IT security, telecommunications, power and the results systems.

Atos said the first phase of the London Prepare Series serve as the first real life practice events for not just athletes, but also the technology team, as well as the media, and the venues themselves.

During the 79 days of competition, the London 2012 technology team, Atos and all the technology partners set up and took down almost 180 servers, over 1160 PCs and laptops, 190 network and security devices and more than 400 printers and copiers, said the company.
International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge said technology is radically changing how spectators enjoy the Olympic Games.

"The IOC is very impressed with the progress of the preparations in London," said Rogge.

London 2012 chief executive Paul Deighton said technology often goes unnoticed and yet is absolutely critical to London 2012 success in 2012.

"The Games cannot happen without technology and I am delighted that that our London 2012 Technology team together with Atos and the team of technology partners are on track to deliver the Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012," said Deighton.

Atos Iberia Olympics and Major Events CEO Patrick Adiba said Technology Operations Centre will be the central technology hub providing the results to the Olympic family and world's media in less than a second, so spectators around the world can follow events in real time wherever they are and on any device.

"Today is a major technology milestone and demonstrates that we are on target to deliver the London 2012 Games," said Adiba.

2012 Olympic organisers urged to support sustainable merchandise push

The organisers of the London Olympics have been urged to work with the licensed manufacturers of official merchandise to make sure they have clear and transparent ethical production policies.

As of September 2011 about 3,500 individual product lines out of an expected 10,000 were already on sale, ranging from metal pin badges and keyrings to sportswear, bags, towels and train sets – many featuring the Wenlock and Mandeville mascots and official logos.

A report called Sustainably Sourced? analyses the work done by the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (Locog) to implement sustainable merchandising policies, in line with the commitment to host the "greenest" Olympic Games ever.

It is published by the Commission for Sustainable London 2012, which was set up to monitor the sustainability of the London 2012 programme.

london olympic 2012

With retail sales expected to be in the region of £1bn, merchandise is a significant part of Locog's revenue generation. It expects to have 50-60 licensees – all major companies awarded the rights to produce a range of products carrying the London 2012, Team GB or Paralympics GB brands.

The commission is recommending that Locog works with these licensees to showcase improvements to sustainability, particularly given consumer concerns over T-shirts and sportswear produced in overseas sweatshops.

There are also concerns that, at a difficult time for the British manufacturing industry, the lion's share of the merchandise is being produced overseas. The bulk is being produced in China and Turkey with less than 10% bearing the hallmark "Made in the UK". Locog has justified this by pointing out that the majority of the licensees are British.

The report commends Locog's sustainable merchandising efforts as "to date, the best the Olympics and Paralympics have ever seen. Locog is setting new standards for the event and retail industries to follow."

But it goes on: "Traditionally, many of the industries involved in making merchandise have not sought to significantly address sustainability in their products and supply chain.

"Therefore, we recommend that a series of case studies be developed using examples from London 2012 merchandise to help move these industries forward. These should demonstrate successes in areas such as ethical supply and environmental standards."

It singles out clothing giant Adidas for having a transparent policy on sourcing, but stops short of naming and shaming companies it believes have fallen short of this high standard.

In a statement the commission said: "We have not had access to a comprehensive audit of environmental and ethical performance for each product, so it is not appropriate for us to comment on individual sponsors, retailers or licensees in this instance.

"Only Adidas has disclosed the location of all factories in its direct supply chain. This sets an example to the industry and the commission believes more partners and licensees should follow Adidas's lead and disclose their factory locations."

Elsewhere in the report, the commission also urges Locog to "better communicate" its sustainability standards to shoppers. "While Locog's efforts to make its merchandise more sustainable have been excellent, consumers may not realise this when they purchase products," it said.

"For example, when a customer buys a product, it should be possible to tell them more about the sustainability story of that product."

Shaun McCarthy, chair of the commission, said: "We recognise there are some sustainability issues which Locog can't solve on its own. However, we believe that by fully engaging with Locog's sustainable and ethical sourcing codes, London 2012 licensees can adopt more sustainable behaviour on a permanent basis."

A spokesperson for Locog said: "We welcome the commission's review of our merchandising and we are delighted our efforts to date are described as the best the Olympics and Paralympics have ever seen. We will now look closely at the commission's recommendations over the coming months."

London 2012 Olympics: officials to be questioned by Parliament over collapse of stadium deal

The news came on the day that the West Ham deal collapsed, leaving a black hole of £100 million that may have to be funded by the taxpayer.

Andrew Altman, chief executive of the Olympic Park Legacy Company responsible for negotiations with West Ham, is among the officials who will be called before the influential Public Accounts Committee on Dec 14.

Details of the inquiry can be disclosed as it emerged that the collapse of West Ham’s deal to take over the Olympic Stadium has left a shortfall in the public funding package.

Margaret Hodge MP, the committee’s chairman, said the cost of reconfiguring the stadium was certain to be raised by MPs. She said that the officials in charge “appear to be oblivious to the constraints that the rest of the public sector are experiencing.”

Dennis Hone, chief executive of the Olympic Development Authority, Paul Deighton, chief executive of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games, and Jonathan Stephens, the most senior civil servant at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, will also be questioned.


Newham and the Government blamed “legal paralysis” caused by Tottenham and Leyton Orient, who have demanded a judicial review scheduled to be heard next Tuesday.

Newham were also facing an anonymous complaint to the European Commission, arguing that their loan constituted illegal state aid.

There was also the possibility that Newham-West Ham could lose the case if it went to a full hearing. Leyton Orient were increasingly confident about the strength of their case.

The hearing will come after the National Audit Office, the public spending watchdog, publishes a value-for-money review of the Olympics in the next few weeks.

The OPLC confirmed on Tuesday that it had ended negotiations with West Ham and funding partner Newham Council because legal challenges meant they could no longer guarantee to have the stadium open for the start of the 2014-15 football season.

The OPLC said it would issue new tender documents for a 60,000-seat stadium retaining the running track by early next month and is seeking expression of interest by January. The intention is for the stadium to remain in public ownership with the successful bidder paying an annual rent of around £2 million.

Under the new proposal, however, the cost of converting the stadium from its 85,000 Olympic capacity to a 60,000-seat arena with the facilities required by a Premier League football club will fall to the taxpayer.

Sports minister Hugh Robertson said on Tuesday that the cost was estimated at £95 million.


Some £35 million of that has already been allocated by the OPLC to a conversion fund, but the remaining £60million is likely to be met from public funds unless a tenant can be persuaded to contribute.

Estimates on Tuesday night suggested the costs could exceed £100 million.

The OPLC and Government would hope to recover the investment in rent over the lifetime of the stadium. They will also hope to attract other sports and concert promoters to show an interest.

Robertson suggested that Newham might be persuaded to provide £40 million to the conversion costs as under the initial deal with West Ham, but conceded that there was no requirement for them to do so.

West Ham immediately said they would bid to move to the stadium. Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, said the new tenants would “almost certainly be West Ham”. This drew an angry response and the threat of further legal action from Leyton Orient, who are also intent on bidding for the stadium, which is less than a mile from Brisbane Road.

“It appears from the mayor’s comments that he has not grasped the reality of an impartial tender process unless he knows something that we don’t,” club chairman Barry Hearn said.

“One would have thought that if there have been any lessons from this debacle of a bid process that they have not been learnt. We will be watching carefully.”

Chelsea and QPR, both exploring new stadium options, last night said they were not interested. Tottenham will examine the tender documents but if the track is non-negotiable they will concentrate on securing additional public sector funding for their new ground in Haringey.

Leyton Orient will go to the High Court on Thursday seeking to recover their full costs.

Andrew Boff, Olympic spokesman for the Conservative Group on the London Assembly, branded the collapse “a catastrophe” and blamed London 2012 chairman Lord Coe for insisting the running track be kept.

The announcement was welcomed by Johnson and UK Athletics, who believe the commitment to retain the track will enhance their bid for the 2017 World Athletics Championships.

What the OPLC decision means for the key players in stadium drama

UK ATHLETICS
The decision represents a welcome boost to UKA, as it guarantees the retention of a running track – crucial for London’s bid to host the 2017 World Championships. Athletics is the major beneficiary without contributing any funding.

What they say: UKA chairman Ed Warner: "The legacy company has acted swiftly and smartly. They’re going to get a positive result.”

OLYMPIC PARK LEGACY COMPANY
A serious embarrassment. They had been confident the deal with West Ham would survive legal challenges. They will now have to spend up to £100 million of public money on transforming the stadium.

What they say: Sports Minister Hugh Robertson: "This is not a white elephant. The action we have taken today is about removing uncertainty.”

WEST HAM
West Ham appear to remain the OPLC’s preferred bidder for the £2 million-a-year tenancy. This new scenario could be a better deal for the club, who could not have afforded to move into the stadium without the £40 million of state aid promised by Newham Council. That money was under threat if Tottenham and Leyton Orient had won their High Court case against the West Ham-Newham bid.

What they say: Karren Brady, vice-chairman: "Our bid is the only one that will secure the sporting and community legacy promise.”

TOTTENHAM
The club welcomed the decision and will look at the OPLC’s tenancy terms. But if a running track is non-negotiable, they have already stated they are not interested. Instead they will focus on securing public funding for a new stadium in Haringey.

What they say: Club statement: "The bid we put forward was a realistic solution.”

LEYTON ORIENT
A major victory for the League One club in the short term. The decision does not banish their big fear – West Ham moving in – but they will now bid to become the stadium’s tenant.

What they say: Chairman Barry Hearn: "If it’s not us moving in, we will continue to object.”

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | fantastic sams coupons